|
c-mon
Feb 6, 2004 13:50:59 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 6, 2004 13:50:59 GMT -5
That just means my boat would have a slight weight advantage over your boat lol
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 6, 2004 13:53:20 GMT -5
Post by furydriver on Feb 6, 2004 13:53:20 GMT -5
be like the cubans and actually use it as a boat
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 6, 2004 14:15:06 GMT -5
Post by 86کТΛηG† on Feb 6, 2004 14:15:06 GMT -5
lmao
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 6, 2004 21:30:54 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 6, 2004 21:30:54 GMT -5
I'm still kinda pissed the coast guard sank that 51 Chevy.
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 7, 2004 0:34:55 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 7, 2004 0:34:55 GMT -5
They are a bunch of idiots...somebody should sink them instead.
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 7, 2004 13:24:38 GMT -5
Post by furydriver on Feb 7, 2004 13:24:38 GMT -5
I heard it was a Buick.......yeah, but you have to give them props they got creative as hell this time around
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 7, 2004 14:40:52 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 7, 2004 14:40:52 GMT -5
They are probally alot of cars under water. Didnt the Titanic have some T-models on board? Oh well...the wood chassis, and thin tin would been gone long ago from rust and decay.
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 7, 2004 22:35:03 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 7, 2004 22:35:03 GMT -5
I heard it was a Buick.......yeah, but you have to give them props they got creative as hell this time around This time it was a Buick, last year it was a nice 51 chevy truck.
|
|
|
c-mon
Feb 8, 2004 3:06:24 GMT -5
Post by furydriver on Feb 8, 2004 3:06:24 GMT -5
ohhh this is the second time they've done this?! wow creative people lol
|
|
|
c-mon
Mar 16, 2004 22:05:21 GMT -5
Post by 86کТΛηG† on Mar 16, 2004 22:05:21 GMT -5
nah. the model t's would still be there. after all nothing under water like that would still be around if it wasnt preserved by tha dark and cold deep water.
|
|