|
Chevy
Feb 10, 2004 13:59:20 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 10, 2004 13:59:20 GMT -5
Same here, most the vinyls Ive taken off, were easy. Most were starting to come off, plus had rust under them...so they werent stuck too good.
Id rather weld back metal in place of a hole, then bondo....but when I do use bondo its about like you said 73nova73...small holes only. Or I use a little (barely enuff to even say I used any) to even out places where I patch it with metal if its needed).
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 10, 2004 14:31:53 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 10, 2004 14:31:53 GMT -5
Yeah, the stuff is a great tool if you use it right.
|
|
k4banger
Newbie
K4banger: When does it stop being a hobbie and becomes an obsession?
Posts: 39
|
Chevy
Feb 11, 2004 4:39:43 GMT -5
Post by k4banger on Feb 11, 2004 4:39:43 GMT -5
I never said it doesn't have it's uses. I can't think of an easier or safer way to level the little low spots. You can spend all day welding and grinding but in the end, if you're not careful it will still warp. As for the "Hammer and Dolly," well they are hard to use in tight spots like if you can't get behind a panel. I think my vinyl top should come off pretty good I was just wondering about those "tough spots," I have no delusions that it will all come off easy. As for the "Bondo issue" I try to use fiberglass if I can, I have found it to be easier to work with as long as it's a "Quick job." I still end up using the "Bondo Glaze" or "JB weld" to smooth everything out for paint though.
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 11, 2004 5:56:11 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 11, 2004 5:56:11 GMT -5
I really wish i had a slide hammer kit for a few places on my car. After you do all the body work, get an epoxy spray on sealer, that should fill in any low spots.
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 15, 2004 10:40:23 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 15, 2004 10:40:23 GMT -5
WTF?!?!?!?!?!
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 15, 2004 23:52:16 GMT -5
Post by furydriver on Feb 15, 2004 23:52:16 GMT -5
wtf do you call that shit?
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 16, 2004 1:51:53 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 16, 2004 1:51:53 GMT -5
A convertible 68-72 Nova? That looks odd lol. The color doesnt help much. I wouldnt mind a T-top Nova...but a convertible nova doesnt look right. (68- 79....earlier models look nice verts)
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 16, 2004 8:13:57 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 16, 2004 8:13:57 GMT -5
they only made them in 62-63, there is a reason they didnt make them in 68-79........and thats why.
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 17, 2004 19:18:38 GMT -5
Post by 86کТΛηG† on Feb 17, 2004 19:18:38 GMT -5
might i too point out the camaro rims and the no front bumper and the big friggin chip outa the hood. O and rust is good for one thing on a nova. make you light enough to keep up
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 17, 2004 19:21:14 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 17, 2004 19:21:14 GMT -5
your lil pony isnt much lighter then a nova...besides weight is not a problem for a chevy lol
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 17, 2004 19:25:18 GMT -5
Post by 86کТΛηG† on Feb 17, 2004 19:25:18 GMT -5
just the lack of tq and hp
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 17, 2004 20:29:33 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 17, 2004 20:29:33 GMT -5
Whats the highest hp rating of a production small block ford? The highest rating on SBC was 370.(and thats not counting the yenkos and copo's)
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 18, 2004 1:21:18 GMT -5
Post by §ùp€®ÑÓV∆ on Feb 18, 2004 1:21:18 GMT -5
Oh silver before you say it. The 390hp stang uses a supercharger. The SBC's didnt. ;D
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 18, 2004 11:02:05 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 18, 2004 11:02:05 GMT -5
Yeah with a supercharger, but what is the highest on a normally aspirated SBF?
|
|
|
Chevy
Feb 18, 2004 11:04:28 GMT -5
Post by 73Nova73 on Feb 18, 2004 11:04:28 GMT -5
oh, btw, the 370 hp i got for chevy is out of a book that only has the ratings up until 1985, so the newer vette engines Probably put out more than that.
|
|